|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Should the identity of the Duke accuser be made known? | |||
| Yes. |
|
5 | 62.50% |
| No. |
|
2 | 25.00% |
| Don't know about this case. |
|
1 | 12.50% |
| Voters: 8. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
I agree. Keep the defendant/accuser's name secret until the outcome of the trial. Merely accusing someone of a heinous crime and can ruin their life, even if they are innocent.
But now that we know the accused, I vote for knowing the accuser.
__________________
Virginia Beach Staff |
|
||||
|
Everyone knew Kobe Bryant's accuser, what's the difference if the accused are "amateurs".
__________________
"The Virginia Nurses Association the first in the country to come out in favor of medical marijuana, has reconfirmed its support for therapeutic cannabis and called for immediate legislation to legalize its medicinal use. Representing some 80,000 Virginia nurses, the association declared last week that it "will continue" to seek the regularization of medical marijuana as a therapeutic substance." |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|